Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CompatHelper: bump compat for DynamicPPL in [weakdeps] to 0.33, (keep existing compat) #309

Merged

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link

This pull request changes the compat entry for the DynamicPPL package from 0.23, 0.24, 0.25, 0.26, 0.27, 0.28, 0.29, 0.30, 0.31, 0.32 to 0.23, 0.24, 0.25, 0.26, 0.27, 0.28, 0.29, 0.30, 0.31, 0.32, 0.33.
This keeps the compat entries for earlier versions.

Note: I have not tested your package with this new compat entry.
It is your responsibility to make sure that your package tests pass before you merge this pull request.

@miguelbiron miguelbiron force-pushed the compathelper/new_version/2025-01-11-01-03-40-839-01336857364 branch from d2c2096 to 726b8b5 Compare January 11, 2025 01:03
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 11, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.36%. Comparing base (8fd64ea) to head (e2cd67a).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #309   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.36%   87.36%           
=======================================
  Files         107      107           
  Lines        2644     2644           
=======================================
  Hits         2310     2310           
  Misses        334      334           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@miguelbiron
Copy link
Collaborator

Seems like julia 1.9 might be too old for bridgestan. The specific problem is that the version of libstdc++ that comes with julia 1.9.4 does not support the stan models compiled with the latest bridgestan; see here

https://github.com/Julia-Tempering/Pigeons.jl/actions/runs/12719681657/job/35461921657#step:8:1474

See these older issues at the julia repo for related problems:

What's weird is that it doesn't happen across all 1.9 test cases. I'm rerunning everything to triple check.

@miguelbiron
Copy link
Collaborator

Another important piece of the puzzle: the "ubuntu-latest" runner is being upgraded to 24.04, but the rollout hasn't fully completed yet. This might explain why only some of the runs encountered libstdc++ mismatches: the ones that failed are the only combinations running ubuntu-latest and julia 1.9.

@miguelbiron
Copy link
Collaborator

Should we drop support for 1.9 too? @alexandrebouchard thoughts?

@miguelbiron
Copy link
Collaborator

I dont even know what this one is but it definitely is not about DPPL

https://github.com/Julia-Tempering/Pigeons.jl/actions/runs/12726261046/job/35474432930?pr=309#step:6:5685

@miguelbiron
Copy link
Collaborator

Can't even see the full logs for some reason, but it fails at the blang test. And I just realized that that specific combination doesn't have a setup-java step. No idea how this test used to pass. Adding it now.

@miguelbiron miguelbiron merged commit 7eb368f into main Jan 11, 2025
12 checks passed
@miguelbiron miguelbiron deleted the compathelper/new_version/2025-01-11-01-03-40-839-01336857364 branch January 11, 2025 21:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant